Showing posts with label Rogue One. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rogue One. Show all posts

Saturday, December 16, 2017

More Thoughts On "The Last Jedi" (SPOILERS)

Warning: This post contains spoilers for Star Wars: The Last Jedi


“I felt a great disturbance in the Force... as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror.” — Obi-Wan Kenobi

The Internet is buzzing about director Rian Johnson’s new Star Wars: The Last Jedi movie. Unlike the two most recent entries in our Disney-era Star Wars universe, audience reaction is all over the place, and seems to be on a divergent path with media critics (who have near-universal praise for the film).

Why is this? 

Why is Rian Johnson’s stylized, gripping and compelling Star Wars tale being met with such ire?

What is causing the bipolar reaction on review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, for example? Critics have it at 93%, and viewers have it at 57% (as of this post).


It is an odd thing, and I’ve been trying to put my finger on what might be happening to cause such a visceral reaction to Star Wars: The Last Jedi. 

I was alive when the original Star Wars trilogy films were released in 1977, 1980, and 1983. I saw all three films during their initial runs in theaters. 

I was there to experience the surprise and shock when Han Solo was imprisoned in a block of carbonite, and Darth Vader declared that Luke Skywalker was his son. 

I can tell you — as a Star Wars superfan back then — that Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back was a jarring experience. At the time, I didn’t appreciate Empire’s dark, introspective tone. I spent three long years wondering about the fate of our heroes. Empire challenged our perception of the Force, and it didn’t have a triumphant finale like the first Star Wars movie. 

Is the reaction we’re seeing for Star Wars: The Last Jedi similar to fan feelings back in 1980 when Empire was released? Will the film age well, and become one of the beloved entries in the saga? 

We didn’t have social media in 1980. The only way people could express their feelings was face-to-face, or in “letter to the editor” type forums. It would be fascinating to see how public opinion back then would have changed with current technology.

I understand that Star Wars: The Last Jedi had some suprises — some shocking. 

It was surprising when Luke nonchalantly tossed away his lightsaber, after a sincere Rey hands it to him on Ahch-To. 


The final moment of Star Wars: The Force Awakens led us to believe Luke would say something profound to her like, “Rey... where did you find this? It’s been missing for years. By the way, Internet theorists are correct, I am your father.” 

Instead of a more profound moment, Luke tosses the weapon over his shoulder, and spends the first act of The Last Jedi verbally wondering who Rey is.

Was it all a gimmick by Rian Johnson to elicit a cheap laugh, or was it exactly what a disillusioned old Jedi would do after being in a self-imposed exile?

Was he being unnecessarily coy with her about her parents — like Obi-Wan was with Luke in the original trilogy?

Or, was Kylo Ren correct — that Rey is merely the child of junk traders? 

It’s hard to tell at this point. The peculiar closing scene of The Last Jedi might provide some insight into Rey’s origin — where we see a young stable boy on Canto Bight use the Force to snatch up a broom. 

Not only was it an unusual way to end a Star Wars film, it could mean that Rey is merely one of many who is strong with the Force. (Personally speaking, I still think she’s Kylo Ren’s sister). 

Rian Johnson has been tasked with developing a new trilogy for Lucasfilm — a set of films unrelated to the Skywalker family saga. 

Some have speculated that The Last Jedi was being used as a gateway to set up those films. 


The way Johnson “shakes up” what we know about the Force in The Last Jedi has left some observers scratching their heads. 

As Yoda said to Luke in Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, “You must unlearn what you have learned.”

The question among fandom is whether it is correct to change course in the eigth episode of a nine-part saga. 

The idea that the Jedi can mentally “transmit” a version of themselves from place-to-place — while they are alive — is something new. When you are looking at the saga’s narrative structure, it makes you wonder why this was something we didn’t see before. 

That is likely the biggest surprise of Star Wars: The Last Jedi. 

The more I’ve analyzed the film (yes, I know I spend way too much time thinking about this stuff), the more I think Rian Johnson’s vision might be what Star Wars needed. 

At issue is whether the Star Wars franchise could have gone on using the same old tropes (we’ve had one release per year since The Force Awakens was released in 2015).

Think about it. How many more stories could have been told using a 40-year-old structure?

This is where many of you will point to efforts like the Star Wars: Rebels series and suggest things could have gone on in similar fashion forever. 

Perhaps, but this allows the Lucasfilm Story Group (the entity responsible for Star Wars canon) to add new elements to efforts moving forward. We need to remember that the story group ultimately approved Rian Johnson’s visions for The Last Jedi.

The reality — in the near term — is that these changes are jarring. Regardless, that doesn’t mean that the saga is dying under Disney’s watch, nor does it mean Rian Johnson was off the mark. 

And while I agree that it was odd seeing a wounded Leia use the Force to fly in space after a battle, it opens up new possibilities for the future. 

It is surprising the amount of free rein Lucasfilm honcho Kathleen Kennedy gave Rian Johnson in Star Wars: The Last Jedi. She’s known for being a stickler (the reshoots for Rogue One and the upcoming Solo are examples of this). 

The fact remains that Rian Johnson created a big, sweeping space fantasy that is fun and compelling. 

It might not be perfect, but I think fans are being too harsh. 

I’ve always said that Star Wars — unlike any other pop culture franchise in our lifetime — has evolved beyond the realm of mere “entertainment.” 

It has become a sort of pop culture religion. As a result, the fans of Star Wars have a cult-like devotion and reaction to the entire property. 

Any of you who are members of an organized religion know that change can be hard. 

Rian Johnson making changes to the mythos behind the Force can be just as unnerving to fans as it was to Catholic parishioners when The Vatican changed the wording of the liturgy several years ago. 

Let’s face it, for Star Wars to become a living, breathing saga that lasts, it needs to change. If it wants to stay influential in the manner that Marvel Studios has over the past decade, it has to grow. 


I’ve heard that Star Wars: The Last Jedi is a superior experience on repeat viewings. I’ve only seen it once so far, but I plan several more trips to the theater. 

Let’s face it, a lot of fans went into the movie with preconceived notions about how things were going to unfold in the film. The reality is that fans were treated to a wholly original story that spit in the face of internet theories. 

What Star Wars: The Last Jedi illlustrates is that a 40-year-old franchise still has the ability to surprise. 



Tuesday, December 20, 2016

"Rogue One": Is it the Best "Star Wars" Film Released Since "The Empire Strikes Back"...?



SPOILERS AHEAD!!

I went to see "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" for the second time today at Aksarben Cinema. I enjoyed the movie the first time out, and had planned to take in multiple viewings. 

(You can read my recent review of "Rogue One" here). 

A number of my friends consider it to be stronger than 2016's "The Force Awakens," and some have argued it is the best "Star Wars" film since "The Empire Strikes Back."  

High praise, indeed.  

I loved "The Force Awakens," and thought J.J. Abrams did a fantastic job creating a jumping-off point for a new trilogy -- and casting a group of compelling new characters. 

But many folks I know believe "Rogue One" is the superior movie. 

They feel the writing is stronger, characters more appealing, visuals truer-to-canon, and the grittier tone more compelling.  

My friend Scott felt that Felicity Jones's Jyn Erso was a far more compelling British-brunette "Mary Sue" than Daisy Ridley's Rey in "The Force Awakens."  

It's incredible when you think about it. Especially considering that this movie featured last-minute rewrites, well-documented reshoots (at the request of Disney), and a change of composer (Michael Giacchino only had "weeks" to compose the score).  

(I outline various production aspects and foibles in my "Rogue One" preview post here). 

A number of my friends even thought my initial skepticism about resurrecting actor Peter Cushing as Grand Moff Tarkin via CG was too nitpicky, and suggested it was fairly effective (if not perfect). Recreating 1977 Carrie Fisher, on the other hand...  

So...did a second viewing of the movie convince me that "Rogue One" is superior to "The Force Awakens," and the best of the films behind "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back"...? 

First things first -- I enjoyed "Rogue One" even more the second time around, and noticed a number of subtle things I didn't the first time -- like the fact that the X-Wing pilot with the call sign "Red Five" died in the movie's final battle sequence, which explains Luke Skywalker getting the designation in Episode IV.  

You'll also notice more subtle things, such as actors sporting mustaches (a nod to the look and feel of 1970s and 80s movies), and the fact that Cassian Andor's blue parka in the early part of the movie looks similar to Han Solo's on Hoth in "The Empire Strikes Back."  

People have remarked how much Mon Mothma in "Rogue One" looks like the actress who portrayed the character in "Return of the Jedi." Genevieve O'Reilly isn't the same actress, but she did portray Mon Mothma in 2005's "Revenge of the Sith."  

Thanks to "Rogue One," the Force now has its own "Hail Mary, Full of Grace..." mantra with "I am one with the Force, the Force is with me"...

Because "Rogue One" is a secondary story in the saga, Lucasfilm chose not to give it a crawl, but it did include the blue text that read "a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away..." 

I understand the rationale for not including an opening crawl with John Williams's iconic theme, but I still missed it... 

The movie really follows a "less is more" style. I don't know if that was by design, or if the Disney brass wanted it to fit within a particular runtime.  

(If you watch the various pre-release trailers, there are numerous scenes/clips that didn't make the final cut of "Rogue One").  

There is part of me that has wondered if the filmmakers ever planned to have Jyn Erso and Cassian Andor escape the battle on Scarif. 

According to this article on "The Verge," director Gareth Edwards suggests that the main characters were set to survive in the original script (he had assumed that Disney wouldn't be sympatico with them dying), but that they never filmed such an ending.  


Honestly, the film was probably more effective with the core group becoming martyrs to the cause.  

Edwards has managed to make a movie that many fans find to be incredibly compelling -- and at the zenith of what this franchise has to offer.  

As to whether or not this film is the best since "The Empire Strikes Back"... 

I don't know if I can quite pull the trigger on that sentiment. I think "Rogue One" benefits from less pre-release hype, and I think production news over the summer might have tempered expectations to a more realistic level.  

I will say that "Rogue One" is incredibly good, and shows how compelling the prequel trilogy could have been in the hands of a better writer/director (sorry, George).  

Is it better than "The Force Awakens"...? 

Both are very different movies, with different goals. I liked each film a lot, but for different reasons.  

What I can say is that this "new generation" of "Star Wars" movies appears to be in good hands... 


..and the fact that I'm having this debate with myself is a good sign (and need to see it again).  





Friday, December 16, 2016

"Rogue One": The Prequel "Star Wars" Deserved


First and foremost, "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is a fast-paced adjunct to 1977's "Star Wars" -- a visually handsome movie that focuses on action and keeps needless exposition to a minimum.

It is not a "reboot of the past" like J.J. Abrams "The Force Awakens." 

Rather, it is its own concoction and serves as more of a tribute, careening its way around the galaxy, adding depth and texture to the franchise.

It is the movie equivalent of a kid's adventure created with Kenner "Star Wars" action figures back in the 1970s and 80s. 

Those of you who have seen various World War II "men on a mission" movies (like "Force 10 From Navarone," "The Dirty Dozen," and "Where Eagles Dare") will recognize the direction "Rogue One" is headed. 

The story focuses on Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones), a girl whose father Galen (Mads Mikkelsen) is the scientific mind behind the Death Star. She is forced to fend for herself as a small girl when her father is forcibly taken by Imperial Director Orson Krennic (Ben Mendelsohn) to complete work on the planet-killing weapon (Jyn's mother is killed in the process). 

Jyn ends up being raised by a band of revolutionaries, led by Saw Gerrera (Forest Whitaker). 

Fast forward 15 years. Jyn is being held captive by Imperial forces. She is freed from captivity by the Rebel Alliance with the hope that she can track down her father, so they can put a stop to work on the Death Star. 

She is teamed up with rebel Cassian Andor (Diego Luna) and a reprogrammed Imperial droid called K-2SO (voiced by "Firefly's" Alan Tudyk) for the mission. 


I won't give you a blow-by-blow rundown of what transpires next, but you can see where the story is going -- tracking down clues and bits of information in an attempt to find Galen Erso in order to thwart the Death Star from wreaking havoc on the galaxy...

"Star Wars" aficionados will find a number of "Easter eggs" strewn throughout the film. Casual observers likely won't notice, and generally won't have the "depth of knowledge" to see all the trinkets that tie into the next movie. 

"Kyber Crystals" are also referenced in the movie (Jyn has one on a necklace). I first read about them in Alan Dean Foster's 1978 SW novel "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" (although they were spelled differently). 

Some of the other attempts at continuity between movies are less than effective. 

For example, there is a CG version of a long-deceased actor who appeared in "A New Hope." We've seen that technique employed in movies like "Tron: Legacy" (to create a young Jeff Bridges) and "Captain America: Civil War" (to create a young Robert Downey Jr.). 

The tech behind such additions is better than it used to be, but is still not quite lifelike. 

Darth Vader also appears in a couple juicy scenes (as shown in pre-release trailers). The moments with Vader worked well, and filmmakers even included red-tinted eye lens on his mask, as they did in 1977's "Star Wars." 

The challenge with any prequel -- especially one bookended on both sides by other movies -- is the fact that there is little wiggle room for filmmakers to tell a story. 

To be honest, part of what made 2015's "The Force Awakens" so intriguing was the fact that it presented mysteries for viewers to chew on -- something that was done to great effect in 1980's "The Empire Strikes Back." 

Disney/Lucasfilm is set to start filming a story focusing on the early life of Han Solo in 2017 -- which has the potential for a bit more space to breathe in terms of plot/character development. 

Overall, "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is an entertaining entry in the "Star Wars" saga. While it might not be the best film of the franchise, it is the best prequel story, and has a pounding pulse that should please ardent fans and casual holiday moviegoers alike. 



Rated PG-13, Runtime: 2 hrs, 14 min

Read my previous post: Not Enchanted by "Fantastic Beasts..." 

Thursday, October 13, 2016

"Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" -- Trailer, Rumors and Tidbits



The second (well, third if you count the terrific "teaser") trailer for "Rogue One: A Star Wars Wars Story" was unveiled this morning in the U.S. on ABC's "Good Morning America" (and on the web for fans to pour over):


I am super excited to see this movie. 

This will apparently be the final theatrical trailer, but I would expect additional content to surface leading up to the movie's Dec. 16 release.

HOW WE GOT HERE...
"Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is the first attempt by Disney/Lucasfilm to "Marvel-ize" the "Star Wars" franchise by creating what they refer to as "anthology" movies.

This isn't part of the main "trilogy structure" of the series. "Rogue One" takes place during the period of time leading up to "Star Wars: A New Hope", and is the story of a ragtag group who unites to steal the plans to the original Death Star (led by Jyn Erso, played by Felicity Jones). 

The story is based on a concept by John Knoll, who is the Visual Effects Supervisor and Chief Creative Officer at Industrial Light & Magic.

If you are a SW fan, you might remember Knoll in the terrific documentary "The Beginning" included with the "Star Wars: The Phantom Menace" DVD. He has also appeared in other "Star Wars" docs, and various other "making ofs" focusing on ILM's work. 

This is a fun video from April showing Knoll (and the rest of the visual effects crew for "Rogue One") watching "fan reaction" videos for the movie's teaser trailer: 


For years, I saw his brother Tom Knoll's name whenever my copy of Adobe Photoshop 5.5 was opening up. That is because both Knolls created the software (thanks guys!)

Chris Weitz ("About A Boy") and Tony Gilroy ("The Bourne Identity") worked on the screenplay. The film was directed by Gareth Edwards, who directed 2014's "Godzilla."

THE SCUTTLEBUTT
There has been some interesting production news about "Rogue One" over the past few months. 

Earlier this summer, rumors were swirling about reshoots taking place, which unleashed a wave of concern among fans across the internet.

This "Entertainment Weekly" article from June talks about the reshoots (which sources at LucasFilm said had been pre-scheduled): http://www.ew.com/article/2016/06/03/rogue-one-reshoots

There were rumors suggesting over 40 percent of the movie was being reshot (false) and that Christopher McQuarrie (who wrote and directed "Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation") had been brought in to direct those reshoots (also false). 

Disney CEO Bob Iger has referred to "Rogue One" as "an experiment of sorts," and a profile of Felicity Jones in the "The Hollywood Reporter" suggests some $30 million was spent on the reshoots: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/felicity-jones-rogue-one-reshoots-937569 

In addition, composer Michael Giacchino (who has collaborated with J.J. Abrams on numerous projects) was brought in to replace Alexandre Desplat (an Oscar-winning composer who has worked on various scores -- including music in the "Harry Potter" franchise).

According to reports, the reshoots prompted the change as Desplat was unavailable to do the work: (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/star-wars-rogue-one-replaces-929387)

I loved Giacchino's work on the "Star Trek" reboot movies, and think his musical stylings are well-suited to the "Star Wars" franchise. 

But the reports -- taken in total -- have created head scratching among fanboys about this new adventure in a galaxy far, far away.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? 
I have no idea how the movie will compare to last year's "The Force Awakens." But the storyline sounds intriguing, and the visuals look stunning. 

Each of the trailers up until this point have presented new bits of information, and the kid in me (who grew up playing with "Star Wars" action figures) loves seeing visuals of AT-ATs surrounded by sand and palm trees (they are AT-ACTs in "Rogue One" because these models include a dedicated cargo bed for construction sites):


Tonally, the movie looks to have a far grittier and more militaristic vibe than its predecessors. But "the force" appears to provide a spiritual undertone to Jyn Erso's heroic journey, which has been key to the "Star Wars" franchise. 

The main unknown is how fans will react to a movie that doesn't feature familiar characters (although, Darth Vader is set to make an appearance). 

I'm excited to see something different, and look forward to experiencing a different take on the "Star Wars" universe. 

As is the case with any new "Star Wars" trailer, YouTube is filled with oodles of "fan reaction" videos.

One of my favorites is by self-proclaimed "Geek Priest" Father Roderick Vonhogen of the Netherlands: 


This won't be the only "anthology" movie in the "Star Wars" saga. A young Han Solo movie is set for release in 2018. 

But first things first... 

As the release date edges closer, you can count on endless buzz and a full-on marketing blitz in support of "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story".

I will be here to talk about it all... 

Dec. 16 can't come soon enough! 




Read my latest blog post: British TV Envy