Showing posts with label Quentin Tarantino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quentin Tarantino. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

Movie Review: "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood"


There is a scene in the early stages of Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” where Hollywood stuntman Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) is repairing a damaged rooftop TV antenna for television star — and his best friend — Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio). 


Like many of the moments in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” the sequence involving the TV antenna is fairly inconsequential to the movie’s plot (some have argued the movie has no discernible plot), but it does allow for a fun flashback of Booth sparring with Bruce Lee on the set of “The Green Hornet.” 


It also symbolizes what this movie is all about — Tarantino’s unbridled nostalgia for an analog life lived outside the ether. In particular, the world of Hollywood in the late 1960s. 

I must admit, there are many times I’d like to live in a world as seen through the rearview mirror of a 1966 Cadillac DeVille. 

The movie’s primary focus is on the friendship between Booth and Dalton. 


Both men represent an era in entertainment that has changed by the time 1969 rolls around. 

Dalton is something of a has-been actor in the showbiz world. He is the former lead in the TV western “Bounty Law,” but has been relegated to guest star stints as the “heavy” in various TV series like “The F.B.I.” (there is a neat little sequence where Booth and Dalton watch the show, which was a real series that aired on ABC from 1965 to 1974). 


It’s no secret that Tarantino is something of a method writer/director. He even wrote five episodes of the fictional “Bounty Law” series so DiCaprio would know what the show is all about. 

Dalton has a lot of doubts about his future as a leading man in Hollywood. It is even suggested to Dalton that too much time spent playing “heavies” (villains) will cause the public (and entertainment industry) to forget his heroic persona built during “Bounty Law’s” run. 


DiCaprio brings a sincerity to the role of an aging Hollywood star from a bygone era. You really sense the character’s lack of confidence — not quite on the verge of a nervous breakdown, but veering that direction. 

It sounds like Dalton’s mental anguish might’ve been inspired by actor Pete Duel, who starred on 1960s series like “Gidget,” and committed suicide during his stint on the western “Alias Smith and Jones” (according to an interview with Tarantino and DiCaprio by “Vanity Fair”).


Most of Dalton’s self-doubt is played out during a guest stint on the western “Lancer.” 

It is during this sequence that the audience is treated to one of the best scenes in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.” 

Dalton (in hippy-influenced makeup and western regalia) strikes up a conversation with his 9-year-old co-star Trudi (Julia Butters) who plays Maribella on “Lancer.”


The exchange between Dalton and the precocious Trudi (as the two are reading books) is terrific. She talks about the fact that actors won’t succeed 100% of the time, but “it’s the pursuit that’s meaningful.”

Tarantino’s movies are known for this sort of gentle conversation — small moments that tie together his films and make the whole greater than the sum of its parts. 

One of Tarantino’s best movie conversations took place with Vincent Vega (John Travolta) and Mia Wallace (Uma Thurman) in 1994’s “Pulp Fiction” over dinner at Jack Rabbit Slims. 

While the exchange between Dalton and Trudi doesn't achieve that level, it is an example of Tarantino’s keen ability to write conversations. 

The other main plot thread involves Sharon Tate, an up-and-coming actress who lives next door to Dalton. Tate is a real-life star (married to hot young director Roman Polanski during the events of “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”)


Dalton ponders the notion that his neighbors could help change the trajectory of his flagging career, hoping his next break is “one pool party away.” 

Tate is portrayed by Margot Robbie, and she is really lovely in the role. Unfortunately, her character isn’t given a lot to do. Part of me wonders if Tarantino pulled back out of respect for the late actress’s family. 


For those who don’t know, the real-life Sharon Tate was murdered in her home by members of the Manson Family in 1969. 

Charles Manson (Damon Herriman) shows up at the Tate house early in the film, looking for a record producer. 


There is another sequence where Booth picks up a hitchhiker (Margaret Qualley) and drives her to the Spahn Ranch — where the fictional “Bounty Law” was filmed, and where the Manson Family resides during the events of the movie.  


Ultimately, the narrative threads involving Manson and Tate aren’t particularly intriguing or well developed. Quite honestly, most of those plot points weren’t terribly germane to the overall plot. 

Therein lies the biggest flaw in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.” The movie feels bloated and over done. It’s a problem that also plagued Tarantino’s “The Hateful Eight.”

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” can also feel rather self-indulgent (for example, there were a number of sequences featuring characters driving around that seemingly served no purpose). 


If the movie had been 30 minutes shorter, it had the potential to be Tarantino’s best. 

There is a sequence at the Playboy Mansion that seems to serve little purpose other than showing how well Damian Lewis can play Steve McQueen. There are also certain scenes that felt like an excuse for Tarantino to give roles to his friends (including a husband-wife pair played by “Death Proof’s” Kurt Russell and Zoe Bell). 


That said, for those who are patient, the last 20 minutes of the movie has a pretty terrific payoff (and is pretty hilarious). 

I should note that the film has a beautiful production design. 


There are all sorts of pop culture cues strewn throughout, including a mural from the movie “Giant” (one of my dad’s favorite movies; I remember watching the double-VHS version with him when it was first released on home video). 

As the movie progressed, Dalton ends up overseas starring in “Spaghetti Westerns” (films that heavily influenced Tarantino’s films) and one of the movies he stars in is called “Nebraska Jim” (I’d love to have a poster for that fictional movie in my collection). 

Only Quentin Tarantino could find a way to toss in a mention of former NFL quarterback Joe Namath’s biker gang movie “C.C. & Company.” 

There are references to Tarantino’s fictional “Red Apple” brand cigarettes, a brand featured in a number of his films (be sure to stay through the end credits for a fun bit involving Rick Dalton with the cigarettes). 


“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” is a mixed bag. While I thought the film was bloated — and would have benefitted from some judicious editing — there were a number of sequences I really enjoyed. And the 1960s vibe was terrific. 

In my mind, the focus of the film should have stayed on Dalton and Booth. 

I think Tarantino is generally given too much latitude when crafting movies. While I appreciate his enthusiasm for the material (and his former-video-store-clerk-fanboy sensibility) he has a problem self-editing — something seen all-too-often in his recent films. 

Less is more. Sometimes it’s better to employ a flamethrower in the editing room and come out with a taut, compelling narrative. 


Tarantino has talked about retiring after ten movies. “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” is his ninth. 

He has written a script for a “Star Trek” film. I’d like to see the director take a break from his typical meme, and lend his talents to a popular sci-fi franchise.

Sometimes the best films are born when filmmakers step out of their comfort zone and try something different. Such a move might give Tarantino's films a fresh veneer. 

If it can work for Rick Dalton, it can work for Quentin Tarantino. He’s just one pool party away... 





Saturday, March 30, 2019

Thoughts About the “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” Teaser


As a movie buff, I kind of have a love/hate attitude regarding cinema auteur Quentin Tarantino. 

Some of his movies (like “Pulp Fiction” and “Jackie Brown”) I love. Others (like “The Hateful Eight”) I hate. 

Tarantino has suggested in certain interviews that he’ll retire after making 10 films. 


Last week, the teaser trailer for his ninth film — “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” — dropped on the internet. 

On initial glance, the film looks intriguing. 

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” is set in 1969 Los Angeles and follows Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) — the former star of the TV western “Bounty Law” — and his stunt double Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt).


(In the teaser for “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” Pitt sounds like he’s doing his same accent from Tarantino’s “Inglorious Basterds”). 

According to the scuttlebutt on the interwebs, the two are having trouble dealing with a “changing” Hollywood during the social upheaval taking place in “Tinsel Town.” 


The plot involves — but apparently isn’t solely focused on — the Tate murders perpetrated by the Manson Family in the summer of 1969. “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” will be released shortly before the 50th anniversary of those events. 

Tarantino told an audience at CinemaCon last year that “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” is “probably the closest to ‘Pulp Fiction’ I’ve done.”

I certainly hope so. 

The Elmore Leonard-esque vibe of “Pulp Fiction” was incredibly influential in the 1990s, and I’d like to see the director return to form with a film that is stylish and “pulpy.” 


As you can imagine, the movie features an all-star cast. Margot Robbie plays Sharon Tate (who was murdered in 1969), Al Pacino stars as a Hollywood producer, and Damian Lewis portrays actor Steve McQueen.

The late Luke Perry plays Wayne Maunder in the film (an actor who starred on the TV western “Lancer”). 

Those of you who have seen Tarantino’s “Kill Bill” duology know the director loves the films of Bruce Lee. Mike Moh portrays Lee in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.” Like many of the characters in the cast, Lee was connected to actress Sharon Tate. 


It will be interesting to see what additional information is released about “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” as the weeks and months progress (maybe we’ll get some additional information at this year’s CinemaCon). 


I’ve mentioned before on this blog that I’d like to see Tarantino write/direct something more mainstream and accessible (read my Dec. 26, 2017 post “Quentin Tarantino’s Upcoming ‘Star Trek’ Movie”). While I appreciate his distinctive style (which is often a tribute to films of the 1960s and ’70s he consumed in his youth), he could do so much more. 

But that’s not his meme or scene. 



Previous post: “Is Apple Too Late?”

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Quentin Tarantino's Upcoming "Star Trek" Movie


News has been circulating on the internet this month about much ballyhooed director Quentin Tarantino pitching a Star Trek movie to J.J. Abrams (who rebooted the franchise in 2009) — an R-rated tome in a franchise that hasn’t exactly been known for its “edginess” in recent years. 

But this is 2017. Welcome to the brave, new era where we get R-rated X-Men movies (Logan and Deadpool) and R-rated Star Trek movies. Let’s hope Pixar doesn’t join the trend. 


The Tarantino news isn’t that surprising. He has admitted in interviews that he is a long-time fan of 1960s Trek. And I had read in the past that Tarantino owns an original print of 1982’s Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan that he screens periodically.


Tarantino also named J.J Abrams’s Star Trek reboot as one of his top films of 2009. 

Deadline reports that “The Revenant” scribe Mark L. Smith is going to write the screenplay for Tarantino’s Star Trek movie. One can only imagine what sort of bear-like creatures Captain Kirk will find himself wrestling in the wilderness. 

If you want some insight into the direction Tarantino’s movie will take, he talks about his vision for a Star Trek movie in this interview from earlier in the year:


In the interview he mentions his fondness for the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “Yesterday’s Enterprise” (with its time-travel changing narrative), but I’m guessing he’ll be tackling the current Chris Pine-era crew.

Be that as it may, Patrick Stewart (who played Captain Picard on TNG) has expressed interest in the project. 

You might be asking yourself why this is all happening. At last check, Paramount was focused on developing a Star Trek prequel movie that would focus on Chris Hemsworth’s George Kirk character (seen briefly in the prologue of 2009’s Star Trek). 

But the Star Trek franchise — in an era where big-budget science fiction spectacles are ubiquitous — has been a somewhat tougher sell to audiences. 

Yet the recent success of Star Trek: Discovery (read my review) on CBS’s streaming platform has shown that the fan base is willing to dive into something a bit more edgy. 

Back in the 1990s, I remember hearing that Sean Connery suggested Quentin Tarantino reboot the James Bond franchise. That was during the heyday of Pulp Fiction. 

Others have suggested that Quentin Tarantino should move beyond the esoteric “art house” fare he is fond of producing, and use his talents in more mainstream franchises. 

You can’t get much more mainstream than Star Trek.  

It’s very possible that Tarantino’s non-linear storytelling would suit Star Trek well, and create something bold and compelling. 

On the other hand, we’ve recently seen the uproar caused when a director/screenwriter takes a popular franchise in a different direction — as is the case with Rian Johnnson’s Star Wars: The Last Jedi. 

Regardless of the outcome of Tarantino’s Star Trek project, the mere mention of the unlikely cinematic marriage has breathed new life into the franchise. 

With Tarantino at the helm, the franchise will definitely "go where no man has gone before..."