Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts

Sunday, August 9, 2026

Movie Review: “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is an Evolution for Our Friendly Web Slinger


By Jon Brooks

“Sometimes, Spider-Man has to do the hard thing. Even if it breaks Peter Parker’s heart.” — Peter Parker in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” 

As I was standing in the restroom, waiting for an open urinal after watching “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” one of my fellow viewers was rattling off all the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) movies he hadn’t watched since 2019’s “Avengers: Endgame” (read my review).  

It’s a pretty common affliction. 

One of the challenges in the “post-Thanos” era of the MCU is the fact that a number of the movies haven’t been nearly as compelling. 

Sure, there have been some gems like “Shang-Chi” (read my review) and “Spider-Man: No Way Home” (read my review), but many of the characters that moviegoers had grown to love (like Tony Stark and Steve Rogers) are no longer the beating heart of the series. 

I’ll admit that I have found myself less motivated in recent years to head to a multiplex to see the latest Marvel movie. I haven’t yet seen “Fantastic Four: First Steps,” “Captain America: Brave New World,” or “Thunderbolts” (but plan to view them on Disney+ at some point). 


So it was with a bit of trepidation that I sat down to watch “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” 

My Spidey senses were tingling as I took my seat. 

Since the Marvel movies have been intertwined like a soapy TV series, I was wondering if I had missed something pertinent along the way. 

I’m sure other viewers have felt the same way. 

One thing I can say up front is that “Spider Man: Brand New Day” continues the Tom Holland-led franchise with all the wit, charm, and excitement that fans have grown to love in this series

SPIDEY’S MOVIE JOURNEY HAS BEEN FASCINATING 

Spider-Man’s theatrical history has been an interesting one. Creative choices haven't always come easy due to the fact that multiple entities have been involved with the property. 


Sony has owned the theatrical rights to the character since the 1990s. They also own the rights to hundreds of supporting “Spiderverse” characters. 

This came as a result of financial troubles at Marvel Entertainment Group during that decade (prior to Disney acquiring the company in 2009). 

At that time, the theatrical rights to other Marvel characters like the Hulk (purchased by Universal) and the X-Men and the Fantastic Four (both controlled by 20th Century Fox until Disney bought the studio) were sold for “peanuts” to generate quick cash. 

This is why it took awhile for the Spider-Man character to be integrated into Disney’s Marvel Cinematic Universe. Creative decisions have been a continual negotiation between Sony and Disney. 

Despite all the legal hangups, it has been pretty remarkable how well the “collaboration” has worked as it regards the Spider-Man franchise. 

WORKIN’ FOR A LIVIN’

In the early stages of “Brand New Day” we find Spider-Man (Tom Holland) working on his own, fighting crime in New York City. 

A spell was cast by Doctor Strange at the end of 2021’s “Spider-Man: No Way Home” that resulted in the world forgetting who Peter Parker is (done in order to save the world from a “multiverse” of problems). 


That meant girlfriend Michelle “MJ” Jones-Watson (Holland’s real-life wife Zendaya) and his buddy Ned Leeds (Jacob Batalon) are no longer in Parker’s life. 

The events in “No Way Home” were set into motion due to a disgraced Parker (who was publicly outed as Spider-Man by the Daily Bugle’s J. Jonah Jameson) trying to find a way for his two friends to get into MIT (all three were rejected by the school as a result of Parker’s alleged exploits). 

MJ and Ned were ultimately able to attend MIT, but our hero (whose alter-ego is no longer known to the world) has abandoned his academic endeavors. 

“Brand New Day” starts off with Spider-Man stopping various crimes around the city. Our hero is no longer a heretic. In fact, he’s a local hero. 


The character is evolving. As the movie progresses, we see emotional and physical changes in Parker. 

As much as I love Holland’s Spider-Man films, the character sometimes felt like a mere cog in the Avengers engine. 

Being Tony Stark’s protege was a cool hook for Parker. But being the “Iron Spider” kept the character from fully realizing his full potential. 

It’s readily apparent that the folks running Marvel Studios wanted to make the character’s powers less “gadget-based” and more “organic” in nature (similar to Tobey Maguire’s version of Spider-Man featured in the Sam Raimi movies). 

Like a teenager going through puberty, Parker’s “inner arachnid” is coming to the surface. For example, he develops organic web slingers (and has to ditch the mechanical version he’s been using), but the issues facing our hero go further than that. 

I have a theory on why this is taking place, and I will get to that in a little bit…

Anyhow, our hero comes across a new threat as he is chasing down ne’er-do-wells in the form of a mysterious individual (known only as V-Max) who is able to perform a “mind-control-possession” thing on unsuspecting victims. 


For some reason, this new “villain” isn’t able to control Parker’s mind, but he also can’t trust the words and actions of those around him. 

As a result, Spider-Man has to play a game of “who do you trust” as the narrative unfolds. 

WHERE IS SPIDER-MAN HEADED?

Parker also has to come to terms with how he is going to control his own biological changes… and how he is going to thwart the mind-control abilities of his antagonist. 

This becomes the crux of “Spider-Man: Brand New Day’s” second and third acts. 


We find Parker reaching out to Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), a man who has considerable experience concocting methods to “hamper” his inner Hulk. 

This eventually leads Parker to a moral dilemma, questioning whether or not these unique biological abilities should be controlled. 

The fundamental question is this: “Where is all of this leading?” 

It is apparent that Marvel Studios honcho Kevin Feige is laying the groundwork for a new X-Men movie. 

The mysterious V-Max (played by “Stranger Things” actress Sadie Sink) is revealed to be a character with “unique abilities” a character that keen Marvel observers should be very familiar with.  

But how does Peter Parker/Spider-Man fit into all of this? There has to be a salient reason his metamorphosis is taking place.


My theory is that the genetically evolving Parker will be part of the new-look X-Men group. Yes, I know that sounds bizarre, but the possibility is there. 

Including Spider-Man in an upcoming X-Men reboot would be a smart way to spur interest. Moreover, it would pave the way for better box office potential. 

We’ve seen a lot of attempts to revitalize the X-Men movie franchise in the past. They need a new hook to get wary (and weary) viewers interested again.  

Practical considerations like this have to be considered in the current theatrical climate. 

I could be wrong, but that’s how I’m reading the tea leaves at the moment.

SOME THINGS I LIKED

One of the stronger characters featured in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is Frank Castle/Punisher (Jon Bernthal). 

This incarnation of the character is pulled from Marvel’s “The Punisher” TV series (that also starred Bernthal). 


I haven’t watched the series, but I think I might check it out after seeing Castle in action in “Brand New Day.” 

Castle provides a rough-and-tumble “blue collar” sensibility to the movie. The character ends up aiding and working alongside Spider-Man. The odd-couple dynamic between the two is pretty entertaining. Overall, Castle was a nice addition to the lineup. 

It was also nice to see “red-hot” actor Tramell Tillman in the film playing Bill Metzger (who is head of the Department of Damage Control). 


Tillman is best known for playing Seth Milchick in the Apple TV series “Severance” (a terrific show, by the way). He also played a naval officer in last year’s “Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning.” 

Even though it isn’t the biggest role, Tillman gives you a lot with what little he has to work with. 

In addition to the new characters, “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” has a new director on board. 

The previous head of the “current era” Spider-Man franchise was Jon Watts. 

This time out, Destin Daniel Cretton was tasked with the directing duties. 

Cretton previously directed the 2018 Marvel movie “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings” (read my review). 

In my review of “Shang-Chi” I wrote, “the likable vibe of [“Shang-Chi”] makes for a surprisingly strong viewing experience.”  

I think he was an effective choice to lead this entry in the “Spider-Man” series. 

The overall look and feel of “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is different than the past films in the series. I liked the new vibe. 

I am hoping he directs more Marvel movies down the road. 

FRIENDS FOREVER, RIGHT? 

A key theme winding its way through “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is the future of Peter’s relationship with MJ and Ned. 

The three were a capable trio in the previous Spider-Man movies. More than that, there was a likable dynamic between the characters. 


I think one of the reasons “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is doing as well as it is at the box office has to do with Peter’s inner-turmoil as he lives a life without them, while yearning to be reunited with them. 

It has been a difficult four years for Parker. 

All of this makes Spider-Man a very relatable hero for the moviegoing audience. 

In my opinion, that is what ranks him among the best in the current crop of Marvel Cinematic Universe characters.

FINAL THOUGHTS 

For more than a decade, Marvel movies largely shaped the theater-going experience. They stood as stalwart tentpoles annually at the box office. 

It has been a rocky road for the Marvel Cinematic Universe the past five years, but there are hopeful signs on the horizon. 


“Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is a step in the right direction. It is an exciting movie with great visual effects and some terrific action sequences (although, my littlest nephew said he wished there was MORE action in the movie 😉). 

All that said, the key selling point of “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” is the human side of the story. We feel for Peter Parker as he deals with the emotional turmoil brought on by the decisions he has made. 

We sense his inner struggle as he attempts to reconcile an existential crisis brought on by factors outside of his control. 

The Marvel Cinematic Universe is at its best when the human dynamic is at its strongest. 

This is one of the strongest superhero movies in recent memory. 

Rated PG-13, Runtime: 2 hrs, 25 min 


>> If you enjoyed my review of “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” consider following me on X/Twitter: @TheJonCrunch 

Additional blog posts on “Spider-Man”: 





Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Movie Review: “Spider-Man: No Way Home” Does Not Disappoint


“If you expect disappointment, then you can never really be disappointed.” — MJ Jones-Watson in “Spider-Man: No Way Home” 

It took me a while to get to the theater to see our favorite neighborhood web slinger’s latest outing in “Spider-Man: No Way Home.”

We had several things on our plate around the holidays. The movie we went to see on “Christmas Eve Eve” was “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” (read my review) — a movie we wanted to see before it left theaters. 

In the intervening weeks since “Spider-Man: No Way Home’s” release, friends on Facebook were wondering why Jon Brooks (of the famed Jon Crunch blog) hadn’t yet reviewed the newest entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. 

I did everything in my power to avoid spoilers (which is difficult for someone who lives online). But I’m pleased to say that I was successful in that goal. 

Last night I finally saw “Spider-Man: No Way Home”... and I’m ready to share my thoughts!

SPOILERS AHEAD

I typically DO NOT do spoiler reviews, but this movie has been out for nearly three weeks (as I write this post). Since the movie is basically one giant spoiler anyway, I decided to give spoilers a go. 

So here goes!

The last time we hung out with Peter Parker (Tom Holland) was in 2019’s “Spider-Man: Far From Home” (read my review). In a mid-credit scene, TheDailyBugle.net’s J. Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons) outed Parker as Spider-Man — he was also framed for the murder of villain Quentin Beck (Jake Gyllenhaal). 


The identity reveal serves as the main plot device that structures the setup of “Spider-Man: No Way Home.” 

With Peter and pals sending out college applications as they prepare for high school graduation, this revelation negatively impacts the M.I.T. aspirations of Peter, Ned (Jake Batalon), and girlfriend MJ (Zendaya). 

Since the gang wants to stay together in college (and Peter feels guilty for hurting their collegiate opportunities), Peter visits Doctor Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) at the New York Sanctum to see if he can help. 


Strange believes a magic spell that causes everyone to forget Parker is Spider-Man would be the smoothest route to take. But the spell is corrupted when Parker — having second thoughts “mid spell” — starts asking for exceptions to those who forget. 

Strange does what he can to contain the spell amid Peter’s requests, but it isn’t enough. Things soon go haywire as a result of the spell. 

At this point, I felt a teeny bit aggravated as a fan. Both Strange and Parker faced dire consequences during the events of “Avengers: Infinity War” (read my review) and “Avengers: Endgame” (read my review). The two should understand the ramifications of messing around with things like magic. 


Surely both would avoid messing with the space-time continuum (or memory displacement, or whatever we call it in the MCU)... right?? 

I learned a long time ago to “willfully suspend my disbelief” with these movies, but you’d have thought a brainiac like Strange would have avoided such a move — especially since he found the “one” scenario (out of 14,000,605 scenarios) that led to the defeat of Thanos in “Endgame.”

But I digress...

Peter then tries the “old school” route of talking to an M.I.T. administrator (Paula Newsome) about reconsidering. 

As he is tracking her down on the freeway (she’s on her way to the airport), he is attacked by “Spider-Man 2’s” Dr. Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina). 


The trailers for “Spider-Man: No Way Home” revealed that Molina was going to be in this movie. At that point, fans knew this film was going to deal with the “multiverse” — we just weren’t sure how much. 

The 2019 animated film “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” (read my review) also dealt with the multiverse concept. In my review of that movie, I wrote: “It almost made me wonder what a live-action version of ‘Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse’ — with the same plot lines and characters — would be like. The more I’ve thought about the concept, the more I think it could work.“ 


While “Spider-Man: No Way Home” isn’t exactly a live-action remake of “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” (and, sadly, Miles Morales doesn’t make an appearance), many of the same principles apply. 

At first, I assumed the only “multiverse” participants we would see would be the aforementioned Octavius, “Spider-Man” (2002) villain Norman Osborn/Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), “The Amazing Spider-Man” (2012) villain Curt Connors/Lizard (Rhys Ifans), “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” (2014) villain Max Dillon/Electro (Jamie Foxx), and “Spider-Man 3” (2007) villain Flint Marko/Sandman (Thomas Haden Church). 

Strange tasks Peter with rounding up the various villains. They are to be put in cages in the basement of the Sanctum. With the help of Ned and MJ, Peter eventually gets the task completed. 


Of the villains included, I really thought Foxx got an upgrade here. I enjoyed “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” when it was released in 2014, but thought the character wasn’t handled particularly well. Electro could have been so much more in that film. It was nice to see Foxx’s character redeemed, and the character handled in a better fashion in “No Way Home.” 


The most compelling of the lot was Norman Osborn. Dafoe is consistently good in the role (and as an actor overall). It seems like he’s been 55 years old for the last 30 years. It was nice to have the character back. 

Osborn is also at the center of the film’s third act. 


Peter’s Aunt May (Marisa Tomei) works for an organization called F.E.A.S.T. (Food, Emergency Aid, Shelter & Training) that cares for the poor. Osborn ends up at the F.E.A.S.T. building, and Peter follows shortly thereafter. 


May encourages Peter to give Osborn a second chance. And, as Strange is about to send the villains back to their respective dimensions, Peter thwarts the attempt, hoping to “cure” the villains before their return. 

This is the second moment in “Spider-Man: No Way Home” where Peter comes across as being rather naive. While the concept of rehabbing the villains is noble, little thought is given to the potential pitfalls involved with changing someone from an alternate dimension. 

I know our hero is a high school student, but he has to have evolved based on all his superhero experience. Right?

Regardless, I stopped worrying about that when Ned created portals (using Dr. Strange’s sling ring) and discovered the Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire versions of “Peter Parker/Spider-Man” from the previous two film franchises. 

I want to say up front that I really liked Andrew Garfield’s take on Spider-Man. I know that his turn with the franchise — in “The Amazing Spider-Man” and “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” — wasn’t beloved like the MCU films, but I liked them. 


In particular, I have a soft spot for 2012’s “The Amazing Spider-Man” because one of the few voicemails I have saved from my mom (from the year before she died) was a message inviting me to go see “The Amazing Spider-Man” with her and my dad on July 3 that summer. I happened to be busy with a project that day, so I didn’t go with them. 

(Each time I listen to that voicemail message, I really wish I had taken the time to go see the movie with them.) 

The interplay between the three Peter Parkers is the best thing about “Spider-Man: No Way Home.” It’s something I never expected to see, and it is so much fun. 

At one point, before the final showdown, the three “Spider-Men” are plotting their next move. During the sequence, we see the Andrew Garfield and Tom Holland versions are wearing their Spidey suits. Maguire is wearing typical street clothes. 

Garfield asks Maguire, “Are you going into battle dressed like a cool youth pastor?” 

In my opinion, it was the funniest line in the movie — the delivery was perfect. 


Towards the end of the movie, Peter Parker (the Tom Holland version) has Doctor Strange cast a spell making “everyone forget who Peter Parker is.” The move is done in order to protect his universe from other multiverse entities (who are bursting at the seams to enter this particular universe). 

The spell works, the rift is repaired, and it is as if Peter Parker never existed. The question is how that all works. Is every trace of him gone? Are there any exceptions to the rule? 

After the spell is cast, MJ is seen wearing the black dahlia necklace Peter gave her in “Spider-Man: Far From Home.” Has she simply forgotten Peter, or is there more to it? 

To muddle matters, Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau) visits with Parker at May’s grave (by the way, she died in the movie). Hogan says he knew May because of Spider-Man. 


The question is whether they will eventually remember Peter (maybe after the upcoming movie “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness”), or if this is a chance for Sony (which owns the Spider-Man film rights) to make movies (separate from Disney’s MCU) integrating Tom Holland into future “Venom” movies (a possibility teased in a mid-credit scene featuring actor Tom Hardy). 

(Full disclosure: I haven’t seen either of the “Venom” movies, but the “memory wipe” in “No Way Home” could have been a way for Disney to “give back” Spider-Man to Sony for the time being.)

Anyhow... 

I really enjoyed “Spider-Man: No Way Home.” As mentioned, it did have a few flaws, and some of the decisions made by the principle characters were head scratching (to say the least). 

I’ve really enjoyed Holland's run as Spider-Man. In addition to his appearances in various Marvel Cinematic Universe properties, the Spidey-centric films “Spider-Man: Homecoming” (read my review) and “Spider-Man: Far From Home” (read my review) laid a solid foundation for the character heading into “No Way Home.” 

“Spider-Man: No Way Home” is a solid superhero movie. It might just be the best entry in the Spider-Man lexicon. 

You won’t be disappointed. 

Rated: PG-13, Runtime: 2 hrs, 28 min

>> If you enjoyed my review of “Spider-Man: No Way Home,” consider following me on X/Twitter: @TheJonCrunch 

Additional blog posts on “Spider-Man”: 






Thursday, July 11, 2019

Movie Review: “Spider-Man: Far From Home”


“Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown.” — Nick Fury, “Spider-Man: Far From Home”

I’ve been wondering lately how the vaunted Marvel Cinematic Universe will fare now that “Avengers: Endgame” majestically wrapped up a decade’s worth of superhero movies in a neat, heroic bow. (Spoiler alert: If you haven’t seen Endgame, see it, then come back and read this.)

With “Spider-Man: Far From Home” spinning a web at the box office, the future of the MCU starts to take shape. 


I really enjoyed the first Tom Holland-led Spidey movie when “Spider-Man: Homecoming” debuted in theaters two summers ago. In my review of that movie I wrote, “it was nice to see something that had the tone and heft of pink bubblegum.”

My enjoyment of “Homecoming” left me with fairly high expectations going into the latest web-slinging adventure featuring “our friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.”

This time out, Queens teen Peter Parker (Tom Holland) and a group of his classmates from Midtown School of Science and Technology are headed to Europe on a summer trip. 


“Spider-Man: Far From Home” takes place after the events in “Avengers: Endgame,” so the school had to restart its academic year to accommodate the students who “blipped” (a term the students use to refer to students who disappeared during the events of “Avengers: Infinity War.”)

Those who “blipped” are the same age. Those who didn’t are five years older. 

Parker longs for a return to normalcy after his heroics in the two most recent “Avengers” movies. 


He hopes the class trip will allow for a much-needed break, and present an opportunity to further his relationship with classmate MJ (Zendaya). He doesn’t even want to bring his Spidey suit along, and has been “ghosting” calls from Nick Fury. 

Unfortunately for Peter, the class trip experiences an attack by a water creature (an “Earth Elemental”) while they are visiting Venice, Italy.


Peter — sans Spidey suit — leaps into action, and meets a new superhero wearing an outfit that looks like it jumped out of Thor’s Asgard — with a helmet that’s a cross between a crystal ball and a snow globe. 


The students are stunned, but impressed, with the mystery hero. As classmate Brad (Remy Hii) declares, “he’s kicking that water’s ass.”

Our webbed crusader soon finds himself back in the S.H.I.E.L.D. fold — working with Agent Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), Agent Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders) and the new superhero whose name is Quentin Beck (Jake Gyllenhaal) — dubbed “Mysterio” by Peter’s classmates as a result of an Italian media reference. 

Beck claims to be from an alternate reality, suggesting there are multiple parallel universes.

Before we know it, Peter and his friends are twisting around Europe (S.H.I.E.L.D. starts to influence the group’s itinerary) so Spider-Man can help thwart the threat of other Elementals wreaking havoc.

Things aren’t as they seem, though, and there are some pretty decent twists and surprises in “Spider-Man: Far From Home.” 

Peter has to come to terms with his role as a superhero, his relationships with his friends, and his desire to move forward after the loss of mentor Tony Stark in “Avengers: Endgame.”

Peter laments, “I didn’t think I was gonna have to save the world this summer.” 

“Spider-Man: Far From Home” is far from perfect, but I had a terrific time watching it. 


I started writing this review on July 2 (when I first saw the movie). In the intervening days, I’ve seen the movie two additional times. I’ve enjoyed it more on subsequent viewings.  

“Far From Home” is directed by Jon Watts (who directed “Homecoming”). 

There are some uneven moments in this latest Spider-Man adventure, and I thought Gyllenhaal’s role could have been developed a bit better. 


The Quentin Beck character is pretty interesting. It’s kind of a shame they weren’t able to integrate Beck into earlier MCU movies as a bit player. If they had, I think his character’s arc could have developed in a “slow burn” fashion leading up to “Spider-Man: Far From Home,” giving “Mysterio” greater depth.  


Marvel also seems committed to the “Iron Spider” concept of making Parker the heir apparent to Tony Stark. We are treated to more scenes between Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau) and Parker in “Far From Home,” including questions about Hogan’s feelings for Peter’s Aunt May (Marisa Tomei). 


(I really like the wit Favreau brings to the role. I think he’s a grounding force in “Spider-Man: Far From Home.”)

Peter’s friend and sidekick Ned (Jacob Batalon) is another bright spot in the film. His charm and affable demeanor adds dimension to Parker’s. The character’s role in the story is something akin to Luis (Michael Peña) in the “Ant-Man” movies. 


Overall, I had a fun time watching this movie. 

It was a smart move for Sony and Disney to finally find a way to integrate this character into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (after the Sony’s “unconnected” Spider-Man films starring Tobey Maguire and Alex Garfield). 

One of the little moments I enjoyed in “Spider-Man: Far From Home” is a sequence where Parker is presented with a gift from the late Tony Stark (there are monuments, shrines, and tribute videos dedicated to the character strewn throughout this movie). 

The stylish sunglasses serve as an “AR tactical intelligence system,” allowing our hero to connect to a digital assistant named E.D.I.T.H. The acronym stands for “Even Dead I’m The Hero.” 

In a cinematic universe where things are not always as they seem, I still believe we haven’t seen the last of Mr. Stark. 

“Spider-Man: Far From Home” is the cinematic equivalent of chasing down a bag of Doritos with a cold can of Mountain Dew. It might not be fancy cuisine, but it sure tastes good. 


P.S. — Be sure to stay through the ENTIRE end credit scroll. You know the drill — all the way to the end. There are some “easter eggs” that have a pretty significant bearing on the events in “Spider-Man: Far From Home” — and upcoming films in the MCU. 

Rated PG-13, Runtime: 2 hrs, 9 min 


>> If you enjoyed my review of “Spider-Man: Far From Home,” consider following me on X/Twitter: @TheJonCrunch 

Additional blog posts on “Spider-Man”: 





Thursday, January 24, 2019

Movie Review: “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse”


I’ve mentioned many times on the blog that, while I enjoy movies based on comic books, I am not an expert in superhero lore. 

So it was with some trepidation that I went into the animated movie “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” because I was concerned it would be too “inside baseball” for casual fans of Spidey. 


Where do I start...

First of all, “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” likely isn’t for everyone. Fans of the webbed hero — along with comic book and animation junkies — will find a lot of interesting things to chew on in the film. 

The story follows Miles Morales (voiced by Shameik Moore) — a teenager struggling to fit in at his boarding school, working to meet his parents’ expectations, and finding his way in the world. 

He has a passion for graffiti, something his Uncle Aaron (Mahershala Ali) encourages and facilitates. It is on a graffiti excursion in the bowels of a subway station that Miles is bitten by a radioactive spider. 


Miles’s subsequent investigation into the bite leads him back to the subway station, where he inadvertently discovers a lab with a particle accelerator (the property of villain Wilson Fisk) that gives access to parallel universes. 

This eventually leads (after quite a bit of exposition) to various incarnations of Spider-Man (including a girl, a pig, an anime character, and a noir character) banding together to save New York City.  


For an animated movie, there is a lot of meat to the story. My mind might have wandered a time or two during "Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse" (that isn’t meant as a judgment, a short-attention span is just an affliction I occasionally suffer from). 

The animation style — which tries to look like an old, four-color comic that was printed on an offset press — is clever, but somewhat distracting on the large screen. 

I’ve watched trailers and clips for the movie on my 12.9-inch iPad Pro (Retina display) and my 50-inch Vizio 4K UHD TV, and the look of the film wasn’t bad at all. But on a large screen, the style (at times) kind of left me scratching my head. 


For those who haven’t seen the film, I’m sure my comments on the animation style are about as clear as mud. But many of you are probably familiar with the “dot-screens” and “line screens” in older comic books where the cyan, magenta, yellow and black ink doesn’t quite line up.

They try to replicate that look in the film, along with background images that are intentionally “blurred” to give it a hand-drawn look and feel. 

For some reason, that took me out of the story. There were moments where it felt like a 3D movie when you momentarily take the 3D glasses off. 

That said, there was some beautifully rendered artwork, and the concept of uniting various incarnations of Spider-Man in one story was novel and enjoyable. 


I liked the idea of Gwen Stacy (Hailee Steinfeld) as “Spider-Gwen” and I loved Nicolas Cage as “Spider-Man Noir” (that character should get a movie all his own, in my opinion). 

I didn’t always love the “Peter Porker / Spider-Ham” character in the film, but there were some funny slices. (My friend Barb loves comedian John Mulaney, who voices the pig). 


I didn’t get into the anime character of Peni Parker and her spider robot thing at all. Then again, I'm not really an anime fan, so it's possible I just didn't get it. 


The brains behind the “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” are talented screenwriters Phil Lord and Christopher Miller — the pair dismissed from Disney’s “Solo: A Star Wars Story” project back in 2017 (kind of makes me wonder what their version of “Solo” would have looked like). 

Overall, I enjoyed the “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” because it was something different. It is nice to see a studio do an animated film that isn’t trying to appeal to the under-12 set. For that, Sony should be commended. 

It almost made me wonder what a live-action version of “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” — with the same plot lines and characters — would be like. The more I’ve thought about the concept, the more I think it could work. 


Sony has done a lot with the Spider-Man character the past 15 years, and those projects have sometimes felt stale and repetitive (although, I loved 2017’s “Spider-Man: Homecoming” and thought it was a nice refresh of the series). 

“Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” works on the premise that anyone can be Spider-Man and bear that mantel. It’s an interesting concept that should be explored more. 

The movie just won the Golden Globe for “Best Motion Picture - Animated,” so there must be something to all the praise. 

I thought “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” was an interesting diversion. It is a very specific movie that won’t appeal to everyone. But, if you’re a superhero fan (and who isn’t these days), then you might find it a fun entry into the lexicon. 

Rated PG, Runtime: 1 hr, 57 min 



>> If you enjoyed my review of “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse,” consider following me on X/Twitter: @TheJonCrunch 

Additional blog posts about “Spider-Man”: